Details about MIT Researchers Spark Debate on Effectiveness of Foil Helmets

Element List > Element FYI > MIT Researchers Spark Debate on Effectiveness of Foil Helmets

Link: MIT Researchers Spark Debate on Effectiveness of Foil Helmets [Preview]

Description: mit aluminum foil helmet

Early this year a group of student researchers from MIT posted the results of a study on the effectiveness of aluminum helmets to protect against unwanted mind-reading or mind-control from nefarious elements (i.e., the gub'ment). Quoting from their abstract: "Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals. We investigate the efficacy of three aluminum helmet designs on a sample group of four individuals. Using a $250,000 network analyser, we find that although on average all helmets attenuate invasive radio frequencies in either directions (either emanating from an outside source, or emanating from the cranium of the subject), certain frequencies are in fact greatly amplified. These amplified frequencies coincide with radio bands reserved for government use according to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). Statistical evidence suggests the use of helmets may in fact enhance the government's invasive abilities. We speculate that the government may in fact have started the helmet craze for this reason." Thankfully, the researchers offer improved design suggestions for protecting your brain against The Man. But according to self-described paranoid Lyle Zapato in a report published Nov. 11, "there are serious flaws in this study." Zapato suggests that the MIT study is "NWO propaganda designed to spread FUD against deflector beanie technology, and aluminum shielding in general, in order to disembeanie paranoids, leaving them open to mind control." Now the question is, should teachers be required to present both sides of the debate to schoolkids?

Posted: 11/13/05 (Edited 11/29/05)

Rating:

4 vote(s). Views: 2954
Views in the last 30 days: 0.

Rate this Link:

E-mail Link to Someone:

Comments

Bill Lama (aka pvbilly)

[Report Comment]

What's good for gub'ment is good for bidness, and those snazy matal helmets look like a sure winner, well worth the extravagent NSF and NASA funding. The next phase of the research should be a test of their resistence to avian bird flu, for those of us who are scared of needles. I'll gladly wear the helmet if it keeps me from being attacked by ravaging chickens. It's just too bad Jimmy Carter wasn't wearing one when he was being pursued by the "rabid swimming rabbit." (try saying that three times fast) Gotta go back to my post now - watching for those gub'ment spies. Posted 11/13/05 - 23:48:49: 13 of 26 people found this post helpful Rate this post: [+] [-]	[Quote] #1

GeniusTJ

[Report Comment]

Where can I buy one of those aluminum helmets? Sounds like a winner to me!!! :nod::nod::nod: Posted 11/16/05 - 12:45:37: 11 of 26 people found this post helpful Rate this post: [+] [-]	[Quote] #2

blockage

[Report Comment]

:cool: I finally fashioned mine. I need to put a network anlayzer on it to see if it works. I don't know if it has enough support to stop the network analyzer from crushing my head though. Certainly I feel my head is more in control of it's destiny. Thanks again MIT! :nod: Posted 12/31/05 - 12:52:57: 13 of 27 people found this post helpful Rate this post: [+] [-]	[Quote] #3

[Report Comment]

I have tested the shielding capacity of aluminium foil in relation to the cancer G S M 900 signal. In G S M 900 mode the H F 60 80 makes the G S M 900 signal audible when you switch demodulation on. I have made a video of the following experiment. When we measure inside the unshielded living room there is cancer G S M radiation measurable and also audible when we turn demodulation on. The signal measured is about minus 50 d B m (-50 dBm equals 0.00001 milliwatts equals zero comma zero 1 Micro Watt) When we keep the aluminium foil in front of the Aronia H F 60 80 measuring probe the signal measured drops to minus 70 d B m, 20 d B m less than without foil (don’t forget: minus 50 shielded minus 70 d B m -70 dBm equals 0.0000001 milliwatts zero comma zero zero zero 1 Micro Watt, so 100 times less cancer G S M radiation is measured when we hold some aluminium foil in front of the measuring probe than without the blessed aluminium foil.). The lie that aluminium foil would amplify signals is simply disgusting and wrong and fabricated purposefully to mislead the public. I M T 2000 is another phone system of which I suspect the M I T is wrong, because now I have shown with two measuring devices with two simple tests that aluminium foil really blocks the cancer U M T S and Cancer G S M signals (blocks, shields, attenuates, its all the same to meat). I have not found any signal in the 0 to 7 Gigahertz range that would be amplified by aluminium foil, only signals that where attenuated. This means my experiment was successful, completely captured on video and aluminium foil really blocks the cancer G S M signal with a factor 100, much better than I had expected, so I am very happy. Because it is clear from NASA papers and patents like the Malech patent remotely monitoring and altering a persons brain wave is now possible I wonder why the judges are not in a shielded environment. Posted 03/14/07 - 20:03:58: 5 of 9 people found this post helpful Rate this post: [+] [-]	[Quote] #4

[Post Reply]

Your Name:
Your post:
Anti-Spam Image: Type the letters and numbers shown on the left into the box on the right. (This is to prevent automated submissions.)